Perhaps the most widespread such abuse
is the no-fly list. Almost anybody can accuse someone of terrorist
leanings, whereupon the accused is put on that list – usually
without his knowledge. The accused learns of his de facto conviction
and punishment only when he shows up at the airport. Even members of
Congress have found themselves on that list, just because they have
names similar to someone else put on the list. And it is easy to get
on that list. Previous comments, suspicion (with no solid evidence)
of terrorist leanings, your neighbor's revenge by reporting you, any
of those and more could land you on that list. Then it is difficult
to get off, even once you learn of your punishment. That deprives the
accused of liberty without due process.
If the statists have their way, they
will also use that list to deprive people of property, specifically
any arms those people may have or want to purchase. They want to make
anyone on that list automatically ineligible to own firearms,
regardless of the reason they are on the list.
Nor is this abuse of power likely to
stop there. Some in the Oregon legislature are proposing a law that
would allow any family member, medical provider, or college professor
to put a person's name on a secret list of people prohibited from
buying guns. It would be very difficult to get off that list. The
family nut case would have power to deny the whole family their
constitutional rights. The professor who does not like comments in
class could do the same to students – no due process allowed. The
accused would only learn of their punishment when they try to buy a
gun. Imagine, a wife tries to leave her abusive husband and he keeps
stalking and maybe abusing her, but at the same time puts her name on
that list. Fearing for her life, she gets a concealed weapon permit
and goes to buy a pistol. Only then does she learn that she is on the
list. He can assault, even kill her with no fear that she will be
armed.
Nor is the no-fly list or attempts to
circumvent second amendment rights the only problem. College campuses
are becoming notorious for punishing accused sex abusers with no due
process – and that at the behest of the federal government. While
they cannot jail the accused, they can keep him off campus, deny him
an education, on the word of an accuser – and he is not allowed the
normal defense. A coed angry at a young man can effectively get him
banned with nothing more than her accusation.
And what about discrimination? Racial
discrimination is of course wrong, but that is another area where the
accusation is considered a conviction. Want to do business with the
government? Better be able to prove that you do not discriminate, the
flimsiest of evidence will disqualify you.
Unless we fight this, we can expect the
problem to expand. This is the perfect tool for the power-hungry.
They will find more and more “special” cases for which they will
allow no due process. Speak out against the powerful? They will do
all they can to deprive you of your rights. If they can, they will
put the burden on you to prove your innocence, rather than on the
accuser to provide evidence of guilt.
No comments:
Post a Comment